Portfolio Revision Evaluation
Does the paper have an adequately focused thesis, a clear title, and an
Is its focus and transitional guidance significantly
improved over its state in the previous final draft?
Does the paper have an organization which is logically developed,
avoiding fallacies and making enough connections to lead the best reader to
this a substantive improvement over the previous final draft?
Does the specific evidence support the thesis in sufficient quantity and
with sufficient quality?
Is it accurate in reference to sources, and is it used carefully?
Is it substantially better evidence than that used in the previous draft?