Sir Phillip Sidney, "Astrophil and
Stella"
Genre: This is often called a "sonnet
cycle" because it tracks in linked sonnets the progressive rise and fall of a love
relationship. However, typically for Sidney who was an avid experimenter in poetic
forms, the 108 sonnets are interrupted by 11 songs of varying forms, usually using shorter
lines than the sonnet's pentameters (mostly tetrameters [four feet per line]). The
Norton editors include the fourth and eleventh songs as examples, and also because they
record crucial turning points in the affair celebrated in the sonnets. They also are
where you can hear "Stella"'s voice, ventriloquized by the speaker, as he
describes her response to his pleas. For one of Sidney's greatest neoclassical
achievements, see
"Ye
Goatherd Gods," a double sestina and one of seventy-eight poems that
punctuate
the plot of his great prose romance, The Countess of Pembroke's Arcadia (Norton ed.
911-16). This work, and the songs it contains, are one of the great expressions of
the "pastoral" mode in English. Think of Astrophil and Stella
as a kind of "inverse" of the Arcadia--the latter was a prose plot
containing poems, but the former is a poetic cycle from which one can infer a
plot. Full "cycles" composed of sonnets, which are the poet's
intentional arrangement, are rare in this period because so much of the poetry
was published by piratical printers without the authors' permissions from
various manuscript sources. However, the sonnet collection, as a form, became a
commonplace achievement of young poets after Sidney and was one of the first published
works of one William Shakespeare before any of his plays were published. To see the
whole text of all 108 sonnets and 11 songs, though the songs have been presented out of
order according to an 1877 editor's decision, click here. For an edition that
preserves the songs in their proper order, see William Ringler's edition, referenced in
interpretive issue #3 below.
"Leave me o Love" and "Thou Blind Man's Mark," two poems
not in the Norton 8th edition, were added by a nineteenth-century editor (Alexander B. Grosart) to the end
of the sonnets in the collection. Based on their content, why did Grosart think
these two poems were appropriate at precisely that point in the cycle? The
poems are available in Greg Bear's digital edition, hyperlinked above.
Characters: The lover, characterized as the "star
lover" [astro-phil with a pun on Sidney's first name] and the beloved,
"Stella" or star, often are the speaker and spoken-to in these sonnets.
However, Sidney's persona often talks to entities he allegorically personifies
as "Reason," "Love,"
"Love," "Queen Virtue," "Sleep," "the Moon,"
"Patience," "Desire," dawn, and other cognitive phenomena in sonnets
that not infrequently describe allegorical struggles among them which we might compare
with the dialogues in Everyman. The court surrounding them is populated by
friends (loyal), enemies (jealous), and various other characters including her fool of a
husband. The reader is invited, especially by the puns in #37, to identify
"Stella" with the former Penelope Devereaux who married the wonderfully named
Lord Rich.
Plot Summary: What can I say? He loves her, or thinks
he does. She tries to be kind, or at least he thinks she does. He pushes his
luck--that he admits (in the Fourth Song). And she dumps him (in the Eleventh
Song). If you see no ironic, self-mocking humor in his descriptions of his struggles
with desire and reason, in his description of love's effect on his performance in combat
(#41 and #53), in his claims about his poetic inspiration (#1 and #74), you aren't reading
carefully enough. If these poems are read with no ear for that irony, "Astrophil" comes off
as a pompous fool. If read with sensitivity, the cycle shows how the whole medieval
doctrine of "courtly love" and the courtier's ability to rise to the stars by
love (Bembo) may be appreciated even while it is subjected to an enormously entertaining
and subtle critique. Perhaps love's "ladder" has agendas of its own,
independent of its "climbers"? And what of the Beloved, in Bembo, that
useful mortal starting point whose beauty soon is left behind by the Lover as he
(always "he") rockets into union with the Divine? What does she
get out of all of this? More importantly, what does it cost her? You
will have to wait until Lady Mary Wroth for
the first sonnets written from a woman's point of view and directly addressing
these issues, but Sidney gives us more than enough evidence from Stella's "ventriloquized"
voice and Astrophil's unconscious irony to infer what he believes love is like
for the Beloved. (If he didn't know, his sister, Lady Mary Sidney,
probably would have been more than willing to tell him.)
Issues and general research sources:
- Sidney was praised by those of his generation as the consummate courtier, the man who
best exemplified the social, political, and aesthetic qualities demanded of those who
served the queen and her state. His career, like Chaucer's, Wyatt's, Surrey's and
those of numerous courtiers, required some degree of excellence in the following areas of
competence: poetic composition (of course!), political strategy, military tactics,
rhetoric, aesthetics, and philosophy. Some courtiers were even more extensively
accomplished, turning their hands to the emerging modern sciences of astronomy, biology,
chemistry, mathematics, etc. (Even Chaucer wrote a full description of the
operations of the astrolabe, the medieval instrument of navigation and astronomical
observation that was the direct ancestor of the sextant which is still used by navigators
to locate their positions in distant seas.)
- What accounts for these courtiers' extraordinary displays of versatile learning and
skill?
You know, from Canossa's comments in The Courtier, that sprezzatura
was an act which hid the long periods of study which made possible the graces which seemed
too "natural."
- What do you infer were the educational processes and support systems that enabled
aristocratic and bourgeois children to acquire this broad range of capabilities which
enabled them to succeed at court?
For
a short biographical summary of Sidney's life and a portrait
which may represent him, click here.
For a clue as to the kinds of educational strategies pursued by these young men, see
the introduction to Sidney's "Defense of Poesy," which we will read at the
conclusion of our assignments in the Elizabethan era (Norton ed. 933-54).
Following that same line of thinking, how does "Astrophil" represent a
fulfillment and critique of the behaviors and values discussed in Castiglioni's The
Courtier, and referred to in the social contest about "noblesse" and
"gentilesse" in the works of Geoffrey Chaucer? Compare his playful
description of his love affair's progress with the somewhat more serious version of this
same discussion in Wyatt's and Surrey's works.
- What behaviors or values do you see these three men referring to that are not mentioned
in Castiglioni?
- Would these be the product of an additional fifty years of change in an England that was
changing from conservative, feudal, agrarian lifestyles to those of a radical,
nationalist and imperialist, state founded in craft manufacturing and world trade?
- Or do they amount to a sense of "Englishness" as distinct from
"Italianness" that we could trace back to the behaviors of Byrtnoth's vassals at
the Pante or the lament of the traveler in "The Wanderer"?
- Sidney's family was politically powerful, and Sir Philip more than
once entered into political debates which angered Elizabeth I and her
advisers. He, like Wyatt before him, was "rusticated" or
sent down to one of his family's country houses (viz., palaces) at Wilton
for openly disputing the wisdom of marriage negotiations which might
have led Elizabeth to marry a Catholic prince to make peace with
England's Continental Catholic rivals, France and Spain. How does
the iconography of the Beloved, rules for representing beauty and power,
which we see in Astrophil and Stella, fit into the Elizabethan court
aesthetic which we see in court portraits of the Queen, like the
Ditchley portrait seen in close-up on the cover of your Norton
Anthology?
Sidney's sonnets often pursue in miniature the formal experiments we see in the grand
structures of
the
double sestina ("Ye Goatherd Gods," see above) or the overarching patterns
in the sonnet cycle as a whole.
- Do you see any small "sets" of poems which you might make by forming pairs or
trios of sonnets on similar subjects? For instance, the anti-Petrarchanism
of #6 is linked elsewhere to anti-Classicism and anti-pastoralism (#1,
#6, #74 and elsewhere?). In fact, isn't there a kind of
"meta-strategy" at work here whereby "Astrophil"
generates poems by rejecting previous schools of thought
and advice from friends, philosophy, even Stella, herself?
- Should we take the pastoralism of The Arcadia seriously even
though it is mocked in sonnets like #6. Sidney certainly spent a
lot of time writing in the pastoral mode, and expended enormous creative
energies upon it. In
"Ye Goatherd Gods" as two "shepherds," Strephon and Klaius, sing
twelve alternating six-line stanzas (hence "sestina," a "sixer")
ending in a one-line and two line epode, all lines of which end in varying combinations of
the words "mountains," "valleys," "forests,"
"music," "morning," and "evening." This kind of art is
like the Fabrege Easter eggs created for the Czars, or the finely patterned tribal rugs
woven in the Middle East, symbolic and intricate and precious but far more
"overbuilt" than an ordinary poem, shelf-decoration, or floor covering needs to
be. Like a supercomputer or a triathlon athlete, they extend to the absolute limits
the creative industry of a being in full control of creativity itself.
I've already suggested that, of those reproduced in the Norton, numbers 41 and 53, and
numbers 1 and 74 make obvious pairs.
- What does reading them side-by-side do to your interpretation of both poems that reading
one in isolation would not reveal?
For any one poem you like from those the Norton reprints, there may be similar pairs or
trios (or quartets!) in the complete cycle.
- Wouldn't you at least like to look at the
poems immediately before and
after the one you
like, just to see if it's part of such a pattern?
- You can see all of the cycle, with the songs in their proper places, in William
Ringler's edition of Sidney's Poems (826.3 S56Hp at Julia Rogers Library).
Since the Wife of Bath spoke up in defense of women, we have become aware that gender
and voice are significant issues in lyric poems of this era. For instance, the
white deer of Wyatt's "Whoso list to hunt" has no voice at all, but her neck is
encircled by the bejeweled first-person ventriloquism of her "owner," her
"Caesar," Henry VIII.
- How startling is the intrusion of the voice of the barefoot and suddenly naked female
visitor to Wyatt's room who asks him "Dear heart, how like you this?" (in
"They Flee from Me")? Find "Stella"'s voice in these
poems, and listen to what the poem reports her saying. How is the
Beloved's subjectivity, her range of emotions and thoughts, constructed by
those intrusions? What do you infer was left out? Again,
comparisons with Lady Mary Wroth's poems
will help when we get to her, since she puts the woman in the first-person
speaker's place and refers in third person to the man.
For the web site of the Sidney Journal, hosted by Cambridge
University, click here.
Among other things, this site includes an index to the contents of back issues of the
journal. The wise student will detect, just from the titles, the general drift of
scholarly study of Sidney's poetic practices, his influence on later writers, and the ways
this bears on study of his contemporaries' poetry and prose.
Back to English 211,
Syllabus View.