Wikipedia as a Source for Information (about Smyrna)
The "wiki" (Hawaiian "fast") construction of knowledge has been popular since the WorldWideWeb first appeared, but "fast" is the enemy of "good" or "accurate" or "true" knowledge. The problem is compounded when Wikipedia.org attempts to define knowledge about hotly contested facts. In this case, Greek, Turkish, and Armenian partisan scholars and ordinary "netizens" have been waging information warfare over the responsibility for Smyrna's near destruction by fire in 1922, and the result is a highly unstable web page that suffers authorized and unauthorized editing to advance one of the three sides' opinions about the facts. Never has the fragility of knowledge on the net been so clearly demonstrated. The following are some quotes from the "Talk" page from the period between July 2006 and February 1, 2007. Who knows if they'll still be there by the time you read it.
Is it just me, or is the article now incredibly POV? I love it how now there's no mention of Chrysostomos of Smyrna in the article... —Khoikhoi 21:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC) I would like to discuss any part of the article to be a POV. All of the information given were taken from cited resources, there may be missing information but no false information.
then who the hell burned my village in Bursa-Inegol there was a hellenic garrison near the willage and no turks ever lived there.
Because the article was ful of bias. Please submit your edits in article as it is now and don't revert. Mitsos 11:32, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
And why didn't you reverted him completely? Please do it, just of the visitors of the page who are reading articles whose factual accurancy is disputed. 184.108.40.206 18:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Is that what you want? This article not to be read by anyone? Please try to remove his edits. 220.127.116.11 15:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
What do you mean? Speak clearly. 18.104.22.168 19:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
I made a little change at the beginnings of the article, the burning of smyrna was a part of the greco turkish war and yet there is almost no reference to it in the article. Plus it doesnt mention about the reflections of the fire and massacres took place in the area in todays politics..laertes d 11:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
To read the current (today's) version of "wikihistory," see the link below, and the link below it for the current state of chaos in wikiality.