David Carnoy, "Amazon Kindle Oasis review: The best e-reader ever, but the sky-high price hurts its appeal,"CNET, updated, May 2, 2016, and
Note that, because Carnoy's article is "born digital," you might, by now, read a later "edition" of the e-book reader comparison than the one I linked to originally. You may not be able to read the original unless you know how to excavate if from the Internet's "archives" of past Web pages. You may read Baker in the hyperlinked web version (blue underscore above) but that version has not been updated. Why not? How does The New Yorker treat Baker's writing differently from the way CNET treats Carnoy's writing?