Andrew Marvell, Various Short Poems, the "Mower and the Garden" group, "An Horatian Ode: Upon Cromwell's Return from Ireland" (ed. prin. 1681)
Genre: metrically experimental lyrics, many in the pastoral mode, and a "balanced" or "Horatian" ode describing its subject's strengths and weaknesses.
Form: Marvell's most common strategy is alternation of short and long lines, like the tetrameter-trimeter groups in "The Coronet" or the pentameter-tetrameter pairs in "The Mower Against Gardens." He also likes tetrameter couplets ("To His Coy Mistress," "Bermudas," "A Dialogue Between the Soul and Body," and "The Nymph Complaining"), which anticipate the pentameter couplet ("heroic couplet") whose measured balance becomes the hallmark of the next century's poetry. The "Horatian Ode" alternates tetrameter and trimeter couplets in which the first pair sets up a situation which the second, shorter pair tartly comments upon. Sometimes the sentiment is admiration (ll. 27-8, 43-4, 75-6) and at others, ambiguous truth (ll. 99-10) or outright criticism (ll. 15-16, 119-120).
Characters: Marvell's most famous personae are Damon, the hapless mower in love with Juliana and hostile to gardens, the sentimentally grieving "Nymph," and his mute but memorable "Coy Mistress." His own persona is more ambiguous, masked by its playful use of langauge and standard poetic conventions.
Issues: Andrew Marvell presents us with an interesting literary reflection of the "binary paradoxes" (my term) inflicted upon English authors by the Civil War (1642-8), the parliamentary dictatorship (1649-60), and the Restoration of the monarchy under Charles II (1660-85). Are English gardens good or bad? Have humans ruined nature, or worse, the New World, or have they "discovered" and "improved it"? Is the poetic art good for religious subjects or does it ruin them? Is love Marvell had worshipped in both the Church of England and the Roman Christian church, and had written to support both the royalists and the parliamentarians. To those who would accuse him of lacking principles, we should ask how they would explain his defense of Milton after the blind poet was imprisoned and near execution by the Restoration government. Like many people who live intimately with civil war, Marvell had friends on both sides of the conflict, and to be fair, the conflict was less a mere governmental dispute than a shift in culture from medieval to modern mentality. He also is a good example of a post-Miltonic poet, one who seemingly measures his gifts and ambitions against the epic poet and finds himself lacking the will and skills to challenge his immediate predecessor.
Summary:
is a religious poem that we cannot date due to its late publication by Mary "Marvell" Palmer (see #1 below), but which may have been influenced by George Herbert's poems (pub. 1633). It also may reflect both poets' common response to the problem of faith in a nation divided by wars over religious observance (among other causes). Compare its use of "wreaths" as a synonym for poems with Donne's "pretty rooms" ("Canonization") and the threat that the persona's subtle corruption by art may require God's violent attack to purge it (Holy Sonnets, "Hymn to God My God in Sickness").Especially note the introduction of the notion that ensoulment, and life in society, constitutes a kind of fall into construction doomed to failure (ll. 41-44). Marvell does much more with this in the "Mower" poems. The Norton footnote (1687) has been changed from the 6th edition note which says "The outsize last stanza, the inconclusive ending, and the fact that the body has the last word, all suggest that the poem as we have it is incomplete" (6th edition, 1418).
Issues and Research Sources:
Contrast this with the effects of the works of Chaucer and Shakespeare, which never went out of print and continued to have enormous influence in nearly every generation until the mid-twentieth century.